https://www.theverge.com/2017/10/24/16504038/tesla-autopilot-self-driving-update-elon-musk

Tesla’s Autopilot is supposed to deliver full self-driving, so why does it feel stuck in the past?

It’s been nearly five months since the last update

Photo by Amelia Holowaty Krales / The Verge

A year ago, Tesla CEO Elon Musk stunned the automotive world by announcing that henceforth, all of his company’s vehicles would be shipped with the hardware necessary for “full self-driving.” By 2019, Tesla drivers would be able to sleep in their cars, he suggested. Musk one-upped that a few months later, vowing to demonstrate a completely autonomous, cross-country trip in a Tesla by the end of 2017.

But since then, the company has fallen behind in updating its flagship semi-autonomous driving system, Autopilot, irking some among its legions of obsessed fans, and raising questions about Tesla’s ability to deliver on the promise of a fully self-driving car. In an August earnings call, Musk admitted the cross-country trip may be delayed. “It is certainly possible that I will have egg on my face on that front,” he said.

Since Musk’s announcement, Autopilot 2.0’s over-the-air software updates have been infrequent and scattered, Tesla owners say. For the first half of 2017, there were updates generally every three weeks, such as the ability to use Autosteer at speeds up to 90 mph on the highway and 35 mph on local roads. It’s been nearly five months since the last significant Autopilot update, and many of the features from the previous version of the advanced driver assist system (ADAS) are still missing.

Perks such as rain-sensing wipers have yet to be added, but more operational tasks, such as the ability to read speed limit signs and differentiate between vehicle types on the road, are also absent. Other features, like automated lane changes on the highway, better steering on tight roads, and auto-summon, were promised by the end of 2016, but have yet to be rolled out. Tesla has since removed the date from its website.

In his announcement a year ago, Musk showed video of a Tesla leaving a garage, driving across town, and finding its own parking spot — all autonomously. While there was someone behind the wheel during the demonstration, the implication was clear: this was a car that will drive itself, and sooner than you think possible.

tesla autopilot cluster

But “Enhanced Autopilot,” as it was called, wasn’t complete. As a result, Tesla vehicles built since October 2016 have many fewer safety and convenience features enabled than in older models. Musk acknowledged as much during his announcement, noting that “it will probably sometime next year” when Tesla cars with the newer hardware suite caught up to the previous versions in functionality. In early 2017, Musk tweeted that most of those features would be rolling out soon, but months later, many are still missing.

Given the lag in Autopilot updates, some Tesla owners now question whether the company can deliver on what’s ultimately been promised: full self-driving. “It just leaves you with no faith that they are anywhere on that path,” said Ian Jordan, an electrical engineer from Seattle who owns a Model S. “Today they can’t reliably detect a speed limit sign, so it just seems like an enormous gap.”

Jordan, who is also an investor in Tesla, said his Model S would routinely “freak out and dive for oncoming traffic” when Autopilot becomes confused by certain intersections in his neighborhood. “Don’t know what it is,” he said. “Every time.” Unlike most other major driver assistance systems, Tesla owners can decide to turn on Autopilot regardless of where they are driving; other ADAS, like Cadillac’s Super Cruise, restrict use to divided highways. In order to gather the maximum amount of data, it would behoove Tesla to encourage customers to use Autopilot as much as possible in safe conditions.

That’s probably because the company’s ambitions to offer full self-driving depends on its drivers using Autopilot all the time. Before Teslas can start driving autonomously, the company needs to collect a lot of data to prove to customers (and regulators) that the technology is safe and reliable. So, its cars run Autopilot in “shadow mode” in order for Tesla to gather statistical data to show false positives and false negatives of the software. In shadow mode, the car isn’t taking any action, but it registers when it would have taken action.

It also casts a spotlight on the major difference between Tesla and practically every other automaker and tech company pursuing autonomous driving: Tesla is breaking with its competitors in the self-driving space by declining to include LIDAR sensors under the assumption the equipment will be too expensive for personal ownership. Musk has said previously that LIDAR sensors “don’t make sense in a car context.” Instead, the cars rely on eight cameras for 360-degree vision, as well as 12 ultrasonic sensors and forward-facing radar.

Photo: Tesla

Most companies assume self-driving cars will be shared and used in restricted, geofenced areas, like downtowns or college campuses. Tesla is banking on autonomous cars being cheap enough (and reliable enough) for people to own. But to get there, it needs to convince people that Autopilot is a better, safer way to drive. As a highly advanced version of adaptive cruise control, it has a lot going for it. But there are internal and external forces that suggest things aren’t going as planned.

Internally, Tesla has experienced a lot of upheaval as it relates to Autopilot. The company’s team of engineers working on Autopilot reacted with dismay to Musk’s announcement last year, believing Autopilot lacked the capability to deliver full self-driving, according to the Wall Street Journal. In addition, CNN reported that Musk reportedly brushed aside certain concerns as negligible compared to Autopilot’s overall lifesaving potential, but employees who worked on Autopilot struggled to make the same leap.

A major cause of this conflict has apparently been the way Musk chose to market Autopilot. The decision to refer to Autopilot as a “full self-driving” solution — language that makes multiple appearances on the company’s website, especially during the process of ordering a car — was the spark for multiple departures, including Sterling Anderson, who was in charge of the Autopilot team during last year’s announcement, the Journal reported. In June, Chris Lattner left his post running software for Tesla’s Autopilot division after just six months.

There are other factors likely contributing to Tesla’s infrequent Autopilot updates. The company is in the midst of what Musk has called “production hell” with the Model 3. Customers and investors are watching intently to see if Tesla can deliver on its promise of a mass-market, battery-electric car. And the effects of Tesla’s decision to part ways with the supplier Mobileye in 2016 are still being processed. With the introduction of the second-generation Autopilot in October 2016, Tesla eliminated Mobileye’s computer vision technology powered by its EyeQ3 chip. The company replaced that with its own computer vision system called “Tesla Vision” powered by Nvidia’s Drive PX2 onboard computer.

Autopilot 1.0 is “still missing a lot of the functionality of the original version that relied more heavily on Mobileye from their vision system,” said Sam Abuelsamid, a senior research analyst at Navigant. “And from everything that we’ve seen, it does not sound like they have caught up to where Mobileye was a year and a half ago.”

Tesla creates the impression that these are changes that can be fixed with over-the-air software updates, an area where the company has proven to be more nimble and willing to take risks than legacy OEMs — and a feature that customers rate highly. But autonomous driving, especially Level 4 and 5 that Musk has promised, requires a very specific hardware suite in order to be safe and reliable. Recently, it was reported that Tesla quietly developed a new hardware suite with more computing power to help achieve its goal of full automation, which would seem to contradict Musk’s October 2016 vow that all vehicles would be shipped with “full self-driving capabilities.”

Tesla argues that customer safety undergirds all its decisions, and that it prioritizes features that would have the most immediate impact on that. Nonetheless, a spokesperson acknowledged that its Autopilot updates have been few and far between, and that the company was working to correct that.

“For our customers who opted to purchase our Enhanced Autopilot and Full Self-Driving packages, we’re working super hard on new features and rapid progress is definitely being made,” a spokesperson said in a statement to The Verge. “As is the case with any new technology, validation of first-of-its-kind technology is subject to a high number of variables which can impact product readiness timelines significantly. While it’s taken longer than we originally expected to roll out all Enhanced Autopilot features, the product already provides significant assistance to drivers, and this year our platform was re-engineered to facilitate improved data collection, mapping, and fleet learning – important foundational changes which we expect to enable more dramatic improvements for our customers over time. With safety at the core of everything we do and every decision we make, we will be rolling out advanced new features as soon as they’re validated, and we’re grateful for everyone’s patience.”

But as Tesla expands to the mass market, that attitude may not be enough. “The customers they’ve had up till this point are clearly within the early adopter group,” Abuelsamid said. “They are willing to cut Tesla much more slack than I think a typical customer would be, in terms of both functionality and quality… Tesla really needs to get all that sorted out if they’re going to become a mainstream brand.”

Any blowback from customers and critics so far has been mild. The company continues to grow sales of its Model S and Model X amid a soft luxury car market, and Tesla’s stock continues to climb. And despite serious questions about the company’s ability to deliver the promised number of Model 3s, Tesla’s brand remains relatively untarnished. Fans of the taboo-shattering company seem to have internalized the fact that Musk’s mouth can sometimes outpace his company’s ability to deliver. If anything, it makes them love him more — even if it makes him seem like a buffoonish character from HBO’s Silicon Valley.

“I want to believe he’s Henry Ford,” one commenter on Reddit wrote in a recent post about the lack of Autopilot updates, “but it’s really hard to shake the feeling he’s Gavin Belson.”

Updated October 24th, 3:11PM ET: Tesla released an improvement to Autosteer last Monday. This story has been changed to reflect that there hasn’t been a significant Autopilot update in nearly five months.

https://techcrunch.com/2017/10/24/why-samsung-doesnt-beat-apple-where-it-matters/

Why Samsung doesn’t beat Apple where it matters

Samsung’s competition with Apple is on premium phone ($400+) market share, and Apple is crushing Samsung in this market.

Other market share metrics don’t really matter all that much because of the simple fact that, according to Counterpoint , Apple dominated the global profit share of mobile phones, holding 65 percent of the global profits with just 9 percent (!!) of the total handset shipments during Q2 2017.  Counterpoint also reports that over the summer of 2016, Apple was selling just over 50 percent of the global premium smartphones, and Samsung was selling just under 25 percent. By December 2016, those numbers had grown to 70 percent and 17 percent, respectively.

Samsung spent an astonishing $10 billion on marketing in 2016, and while it doesn’t report how much of it was spent on marketing its premium phones, it was likely in the billions — and probably more than what Apple has spent globally.

So why is Samsung’s premium phone market share shrinking? Why do consumers with discretionary spending still prefer Apple in such large numbers?

The reason is not the product. Samsung is a product innovation powerhouse, launching state-of-the-art devices that compete head to head with Apple’s mobile products and getting rave reviews. The reason for this wide gap in the premium handset market share lies elsewhere: in sales and marketing innovation — or lack thereof.

Samsung is a South Korean manufacturing company, which relies mostly on channel partners to sell its mobile products. That means that Samsung’s leaders see their partners as bearing the responsibility for the buying and servicing experiences. Samsung has been focusing on providing massive marketing air cover in the form of ads, sponsorships and any other activity that is externalizing all the creativity and innovation in sales and marketing to a third-party. Samsung just loves to outspend its rivals with money they give to marketing agencies — money that isn’t invested in internal capabilities.

But that just doesn’t cut it against a sophisticated direct-to-consumer powerhouse like Apple. Apple has been launching state-of-the-art products too, but it is matched by state-of-the-art direct sales and marketing capabilities. Apple is the world’s most successful retailer (sales per square foot), by far. Apple is also showing off these achievements and prioritizes them: In its 2017 event, Tim Cook opened the keynote and before he presented any of the new products, he called on Angela Ahrendts, SVP Retail, to show off the innovation and amazing new experiences of buying and immersing with Apple.

That was before anyone talked about the iPhone X or any other product. In a way, it showed that Tim Cook thinks that the experience of buying from Apple has more long-term impact on the business than the next version of the iPhone. The scaled personal touch with Apple, the consumer interaction, is so important — and it is the key to its continued wins over Samsung. Samsung leadership simply doesn’t care as much about it as Apple.

Case in point: In August, DJ Koh, Samsung’s president of Mobile Communications Business, went onstage during the Unpacked event of the Note8 and talked about the product, only to be followed by Justin Denison, SVP of Product Strategy, to talk more about, well, the product. This pattern is consistent throughout Samsung’s major keynote addresses at CES and MWC. With rare exceptions, and always low in priority, Samsung’s leaders simply don’t show off the experience of buying Samsung or getting service at Samsung.

This culture and strategy difference also is manifested in the innovation happening within the brand’s sales and marketing departments. It starts with customer data. You can’t use the iPhone without having an account with Apple, which means that Apple knows a lot about you. In Samsung’s case, it has yielded the customer data benefit to Google, though the benefits of that decision probably outweigh the detriments.

The operating system excuse doesn’t let Samsung off the hook. Apple is continuously improving its internal sales and marketing capabilities because it has a straightforward management structure. Therefore, it can experiment as rapidly here as it does with its products (and probably faster). Apple is applying AI and other novel concepts in its operations. Apple was the first among the two to experiment with proximity in its sales operations, and its CRM system is state-of-the-art.

Contrary to that, Samsung depends on its sister company, Samsung SDS, for many of its internal sales and marketing capabilities. This structure causes a lot of friction, and innovation lags significantly behind Apple. Excluding its agencies, Samsung is not using AI in its sales and marketing operations and it has only just started experimenting with proximity (full disclosure: I initiated the development and delivery of this capability). Most of it is no thanks to leadership in Korea but to the creative marketing talent here in the U.S. that is willing to take risks and craves to innovate.

In service, Apple’s Genius Bar and call center is the standard to match. Samsung was still using pen and paper earlier this year in most of its customer-facing service operations in its flagship location at 837 Washington Street in NYC.

Samsung can close this gap with Apple if its Korean leadership will change the culture, prioritizing and investing in sales and marketing innovation. It should also consider breaking away from Samsung SDS or merging with it (shareholders are pushing for it), simplifying the management structure over its internal IT systems.

Apple proved that in order to be the leader in this premium category, a brand must be investing and committing to providing the best shopping and service experience possible. If Samsung could match its world-class products with a world-class buying and serving experiences, it has a chance of leveling the playing field with Apple in the premium handset market.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/robots/a28764/darpa-wants-your-ideas-on-swarms-of-drones/

DARPA Is Seeking Ideas for Drone Swarms to Assist Troops

The defense agency is trying to make autonomous swarms of drones that obey commands from troops on the ground.

DARPA, according to its press release, wants to “engage with a wider developer and user audience through rapid technology-development and integration efforts.” This translates to what DARPA is calling “swarm sprints” with “sprinters” (companies developing drone technology) testing one of five various components of building a swarm of drones. These include the complexity of the swarm’s task (known as agency complexity), the complexity of the interactions within the swarm, the diversity or heterogeneity of drones within the swarm, how the swarm interacts with humans, and finally the sheer number of drones within the swarm.

“The swarm sprints are empirical experiments designed to accelerate our understanding of what swarms can do in urban environments,” Timothy Chung, program manager in DARPA’s Tactical Technology Office (TTO), said in a press release. “By having swarm sprints at regular intervals, we’re able to ensure that we’re keeping up with the latest technologies—and are in fact helping inform and advance those technologies—to better suit the needs of the OFFSET program. Given the wide range of capabilities that we’re interested in, we’re looking for wherever those innovative solutions are going to come from, whether they be small businesses, academic institutions, or large corporations.”

There are two types of sprints: those that occur every six months, called core sprints, and ad hoc sprints. Applications are open for the first core sprints which DARPA hopes will result in “swarm tactics for a mixed swarm of 50 air and ground robots to isolate an urban objective within an area of two square city blocks over a mission duration of 15 to 30 minutes.”

Within that urban environment, DARPA hopes to explore “performing reconnaissance, identifying ingress and egress points, and establishing a perimeter around an area of operation.” Proposals are due at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 29, 2017, and you can check out the government applications here.

The military has been interested in swarming drones for some time now. In 2016, the Washington Post reported on Perdix, a micro-drone system in which swarms flew in packs of at least 20. Perdix was identified to the Post has having begun testing in 2014. Perdix was built by the Pentagon’s Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO), and earlier this year a demonstration aired on “60 Minutes” of three F/A-18 Super Hornet fighter jets releasing a swarm of 103 Perdix drones.

DARPA is hoping to develop drones swarms that can be just as effective allies to troops on the ground as Perdix could be to aircraft in the skies.

Source: DARPA via Motherboard

http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/companies/lupin-gets-fda-approval-for-drug-to-treat-parkinsons-disease-2418843.html

Lupin gets FDA approval for drug to treat Parkinson’s disease

Pharma major Lupin has received final approval for its carbidopa tablets, used for treatment of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease, from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Lupin gets FDA approval for drug to treat Parkinson's diseasePharma major Lupin on Tuesday said it has received final approval for its carbidopa tablets, used for treatment of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease, from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

“We have received final approval for Carbidopa tablets, 25 mg from the USFDA to market a generic version of Aton Pharma Inc’s Lodosyn tablets, 25 mg,” a company statement said.

Lupin’s carbidopa tablets, 25 mg is indicated for use with carbidopa-levodopa or with levodopa in the treatment of the symptoms of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (paralysis agitans), postencephalitic parkinsonism, and symptomatic parkinsonism, which may follow injury to the nervous system by carbon monoxide intoxication and/or manganese intoxication.

Carbidopa tablets, 25 mg had annual sales of approximately USD 21.9 million in the US as per IMS MAT June 2017.

Lupin is engaged in developing and delivering a wide range of branded and generic formulations, biotechnology products and APIs globally.

https://news.ubc.ca/2017/10/23/regulators-of-sharing-economy-platforms-caught-between-competing-interests/

https://www.engadget.com/2017/10/24/tactile-soft-sensor-controller-wearable/

Tactile soft sensor can turn anything into a controller

The thin, rubbery sensor can be programmed to control everything from computers to TVs.
Purdue University

Researchers at Purdue University have developed a soft sensor toolkit that could pave the way for more tactile wearables. Tragically dubbed “iSoft,” the thin, rubbery device reacts to continuous movement, including touch and stretch controls. With its accompanying software platform, you can customize it to interact with everything from gamepads to televisions and phones. We’ve already seen Google and Levis team up on a smart jacket that lets you control newer handsets using gestures and haptic feedback. According to its creators, this latest sensor offers a low-cost way to get tactile tech into the hands of the masses.

“The novel part of iSoft is that it does not need any wiring or electronics within the material,” said Karthik Ramani, director of Purdue University’s C Design Lab. “The platform provides the ability to create and customize soft sensors. Even if you have no professional knowledge of electronics you can modify any object with it, including objects with complex shapes.”

The iSoft sensor is made of a “piezoresistive” carbon-filled silicone rubber, which when touched changes electrical resistance to provide sensing data. Meanwhile, an algorithm allows the sensor to continuously interact with interfaces even while it’s being stretched or deformed. But, there’s still a while to go before the toolkit sees the light of day. For now, Purdue University’s Office of Technology Commercializtion has a filed a patent for the iSoft. The researchers will dish more details at the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) in Quebec City, Canada, tomorrow.

Source: Purdue University

http://www.kurzweilai.net/this-voice-authentication-wearable-could-block-voice-assistant-or-bank-spoofing

This voice-authentication wearable could block voice-assistant or bank spoofing

Would disable unauthorized voice commands like “OK Google” or “Alexa”
October 23, 2017

“Alexa, turn off my security system.” (credit: Amazon)

University of Michigan (U-M) scientists have developed a voice-authentication system for reducing the risk of being spoofed when you use a biometric system to log into secure services or a voice assistant (such as Amazon Echo and Google Home).

A hilarious example of spoofing a voice assistant happened during a Google commercial during the 2017 Super Bowl. When actors voiced “OK Google” commands on TV, viewers’ Google Home devices obediently began to play whale noises, flip lights on, and take other actions.

More seriously, an adversary could possibly bypass current voice-as-biometric authentication mechanisms, such as Nuance’s “FreeSpeech” customer authentication platform (used in a call centers and banks) by simply impersonating the user’s voice (possibly by using Adobe Voco software), the U-M scientists also point out.*

The VAuth system

VAuth system (credit: Kassem Fawaz/ACM Mobicom 2017)

The U-M VAuth (continuous voice authentication, pronounced “vee-auth”) system aims to make that a lot more difficult. It uses a tiny wearable device (which could be built in to a necklace, earbud/earphones/headset, or eyeglasses) containing an accelerometer (or a special microphone) that detects and measures vibrations on the skin of a person’s face, throat, or chest.

VAuth prototype features accelerometer chip for detecting body voice vibrations and Bluetooth transmitter (credit: Huan Feng et al./ACM)

The team has built a prototype using an off-the-shelf accelerometer and a Bluetooth transmitter, which sends the vibration signal to a real-time matching engine in a device (such as Google Home). It matches these vibrations with the sound of that person’s voice to create a unique, secure signature that is constant during an entire session (not just at the beginning). The team has also developed matching algorithms and software for Google Now.

Security holes in voice authentication systems

“Increasingly, voice is being used as a security feature but it actually has huge holes in it,” said Kang Shin, the Kevin and Nancy O’Connor Professor of Computer Science and professor of electrical engineering and computer science at U-M. “If a system is using only your voice signature, it can be very dangerous. We believe you have to have a second channel to authenticate the owner of the voice.”

VAuth doesn’t require training and is also immune to voice changes over time and different situations, such as sickness (a sore throat) or tiredness — a major limitation of voice biometrics, which require training from each individual who will use them, says the team.

The team tested VAuth with 18 users and 30 voice commands. It achieved a 97-percent detection accuracy and less than 0.1 percent false positive rate, regardless of its position on the body and the user’s language, accent or even mobility. The researchers say it also successfully thwarts various practical attacks, such as replay attacks, mangled voice attacks, or impersonation attacks.

A study on VAuth was presented Oct. 19 at the International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, MobiCom 2017, in Snowbird, Utah and is available for open-access download.

The work was supported by the National Science Foundation. The researchers have applied for a patent and are seeking commercialization partners to help bring the technology to market.

As explained in this KurzweilAI articleAdobe Voco technology (aka “Photoshop for voice”) makes it easy to add or replace a word in an audio recording of a human voice by simply editing a text transcript of the recording. New words are automatically synthesized in the speaker’s voice — even if they don’t appear anywhere else in the recording.


Abstract of Continuous Authentication for Voice Assistants

Voice has become an increasingly popular User Interaction (UI) channel, mainly contributing to the current trend of wearables, smart vehicles, and home automation systems. Voice assistants such as Alexa, Siri, and Google Now, have become our everyday fixtures, especially when/where touch interfaces are inconvenient or even dangerous to use, such as driving or exercising. The open nature of the voice channel makes voice assistants difficult to secure, and hence exposed to various threats as demonstrated by security researchers. To defend against these threats, we present VAuth, the first system that provides continuous authentication for voice assistants. VAuth is designed to fit in widely-adopted wearable devices, such as eyeglasses, earphones/buds and necklaces, where it collects the body-surface vibrations of the user and matches it with the speech signal received by the voice assistant’s microphone. VAuth guarantees the voice assistant to execute only the commands that originate from the voice of the owner. We have evaluated VAuth with 18 users and 30 voice commands and find it to achieve 97% detection accuracy and less than 0.1% false positive rate, regardless of VAuth’s position on the body and the user’s language, accent or mobility. VAuth successfully thwarts various practical attacks, such as replay attacks, mangled voice attacks, or impersonation attacks. It also incurs low energy and latency overheads and is compatible with most voice assistants.

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609131/fiction-that-gets-ai-right/

Fiction That Gets AI Right

Most fictional accounts of AI are BS—here are some that aren’t.

Even the most futuristic applications of AI, from robotic servants to instant health scans, somehow already seem familiar because they have been endless fodder for pop culture. At the movies, you’ve probably seen artificial intelligence as a menace in The Terminator or 2001: A Space Odyssey; as a near-destroyer of the world in WarGames; as our master in The Matrix; or as a companion (as in Her and in the Stanley Kubrick–Steven Spielberg combination that was called A.I. Artificial Intelligence). But many lesser-known stories, plays, TV shows, and films stand out as well for their perceptiveness about how sophisticated AI will affect us. Here are a few suggestions. —Brian Bergstein

The Machine Stops, by E.M. Forster, 1909

Humanity, in its desire for comfort, had over-reached itself. It had exploited the riches of nature too far. Quietly and complacently, it was sinking into decadence, and progress had come to mean the progress of the Machine.

This story is part of our November/December 2017 Issue

See the rest of the issue
Subscribe

This short story takes place in a future chillingly akin to the Singularity as envisioned by Ray Kurzweil, except here it’s the final step before the end of the world rather than the epitome of computer-assisted enlightenment. Everyone sits alone in an underground room, listening to lectures from, or giving lectures to, friends who are always remote; they appear to each other in something like holograms, because life is now only about the endless discussion of ideas rather than physical experience. The Machine takes care of all their other needs—for a time, at least.

R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots), by Karel Capek, 1920

“‘Robots of the world! We, the first union at Rossum’s Universal Robots, declare that man is our enemy and the blight of the universe.’ Who the hell taught them to use phrases like that?”

This play introduced “robot” into the language, from the Czech word “robota,” which means “forced labor.” It’s all about the hubris of a factory owner unable to resist the temptation to automate as much labor as possible—until the “artificial people” he creates turn on him and the rest of humanity.

There Will Come Soft Rains, by Ray Bradbury, 1950

“Mrs. McClellan, which poem would you like this evening?” The house was silent. The voice said at last, “Since you express no preference, I shall select a poem at random.”

A smart home in post-apocalypse 2026 has outlived its human occupants but still cooks for them and tries to guide them through their daily routines.

Humans, debuted in 2015

Hobb: “Robert, these machines are conscious.”

Robert: “How do you know they don’t just simulate it?”

Hobb: “How do we know you don’t?”

Imagine the world of today, except that artificial people called Synths handle the drudgery in factories, farm fields, and homes. This TV series is gripping because it explores the implications on many levels. How does robotic labor erode humans’ motivation and sense of purpose? And what if some of these Synths can feel and think for themselves? There’s a whiff of R.U.R. to it, and in fact a character who illegally hacks robots has the last name of Capek.

Chappie, 2015

“Chappie, in life, lots of people will tell you what you can’t do. And you know what, you must never listen.”

Unlike a machine encoded with the Three Laws of Robotics in Isaac Asimov’s stories, the police droid named Chappie in this movie doesn’t know from the start how to behave. He has to learn right and wrong by observing the world. That childlike innocence becomes problematic when he gets stolen by two gangsters who try to use him for crime. As Gary Marcus, a psychologist and AI entrepreneur, wrote in the New Yorker, “Chappie can be seen an impassioned plea for moral education, not just for humans but for our future silicon-based companions.”

Speak, by Louisa Hall, 2015

Ramona learned for the sake of her doll. She ran with her doll so her doll could feel movement. The two of them never fought. They were perfect for each other. My daughter’s doll was a softly blurred mirror that I held up to her face.

The recollections of an AI doll creator and four other characters—who all live at different points in time from 1663 to 2040—are interwoven in this novel to explore fundamental similarities between human and computer intelligence, memory, and expression. (For more by Hall, see “How We Feel About Robots That Feel”)

http://www.techradar.com/news/how-to-get-a-good-apple-watch-deal-this-black-friday-in-the-us

How to get a good Apple Watch deal this Black Friday in the US

Everyone wants a cheap Apple Watch 3

Finding a cheap Apple Watch among the Black Friday 2017 deals may be the ultimate prize come November 24 in the US. It’s the one time of the year when the world comes together to celebrate the true meaning of Thanksgiving – getting hold of sweet tech gear at bargain basement prices.

It’s the ideal opportunity to get your hands on the flashy tech you’ve been drooling over for the past year, and an otherwise pricey Apple Watch deal will be at the top of many shopping lists. With the original Watch a few years old, and Apple’s gear often retaining its value, it’s one of the few times in the year where you might pick up a bargain on Cupertino’s smartwatch.

However, many of the best Apple Watch Black Friday deals are likely to be hidden among an ocean of unexciting offers. Some shops may claim to be cutting the price of the watch, but haven’t knocked much off the tag, while others may be trying to shift old stock of the first edition, which isn’t quite as attractively feature rich as the latest gear.

TechRadar, will be digging out the best deals on Black Friday. But in the meantime, we’ve put together this guide to equip you with all the info you need to get the best Apple Watch deal for you. Shop smart, save big with these tips.

The Nike+ Apple Watch variant comes with a workout-focussed strap. Image credit: Apple

Series 1, Series 2 or Series 3?

There are three different versions of the Apple Watch; Series 1Series 2 and new Apple Watch 3. They may be badged up slightly different on third party sites outside the official Apple website, and could be spotted under their colloquial Apple Watch 1 or first edition Apple Watch monikers.

Want a handy tip? You won’t find the Series 2 on the Apple website anymore. But! It can still be found on on third party websites. It’ll likely be cheaper, but note that the range has progressed dramatically since its earlier incarnations. So double check the spec sheet is up to your demands.

Series 3 special editions

On top of the base level Apple Watches, there are also three special editions of the Apple Watch Series 3. These are the Apple Watch Edition, the Apple Watch Hermes, and the Apple Watch Nike+. It’s purely a cosmetic thing though – they all share the same specs as the standard models.

The Apple Watch Edition has a ceramic finish in both white and grey, which gives it a more premium aesthetic. The casing is lighter and four times more durable than the standard stainless steel version.

The Apple Watch Hermes is made from stainless steel with more unusual strap options, the Hermes stamp of approval on the back and different watch faces.

The Nike+ style boasts different strap options, this time geared up for sport, as well as Nike watch faces. It’s made from aluminum so it’s as light as possible and has the Nike swoosh on the strap too.

They are all more expensive than your regular Apple Watch models, but note that that’s in part because they all pack in the premium cellular connection, too.

Looking for the cellular Apple Watch Series 3? Keep an eye out for the red crown. Image credit: Apple

Cellular connectivity

The Series 3 Watch can be purchased with just GPS built-in, or with the additional premium of a cellular connection. This means you’d be able to use it to make calls and do other things independently from your iPhone. However, it also means you’re going to need a bolt-on data package for the Watch too. If you make a saving in-store, remember that this will be an ongoing cost.

If you can’t tell the difference between the two by looking at them, the SIM version has a red accent on the crown (the little dial at the side).

Remember that, if you’re the sort of person who can’t bare to be separated from their phone anyway, you’re not going to see a huge benefit from a Watch with a standalone cellular connection.

Fitness tracking

If you’re a fitness fan, play close attention to the different features of each Apple Watch generation. It could mean the difference between you loving and regretting your purchase.

The Series 1 has a built-in heart rate sensor and accelerometer, which is a good start for an activity tracker. But there are a few things missing, notably the built-in GPS like the Series 2 and Series 3 later squeezed in. If you want a device that’s a fitness companion for basic workouts the Series 1 will probably do – just don’t expect to track your routes.

If  you’re a wet and wild swimmer you’ll need the Series 2 or the Series 3 though for sure. The Series 1 may be splashproof, but that onlu means it can deal with a sweaty workout or a run in the rain. The Series 3 can handle being submerged up to 50 metres, letting you dive to a significant depth without damaging the device.

Although the Series 2 and Series 3 are similar when it comes to fitness, the 3 has a barometric altimeter, which means it can track elevation data making it a good option if you enjoy outdoor activities, like cycling or running along trails.

If you’re really keen to use your Apple Watch for fitness, bear this in mind when you’re shopping for different styles and bands too. For example, the Series 3 watch can come with a sport band, a sport loop or a Milanese loop.

Apple Watch – how will you use yours? Image credit: Pexels

Series 2 vs Series 3

In Apple’s eyes the Series 2 Apple Watch is as dead as the dodo, but that doesn’t stop there from being some serious discounts on Series 2 watches from other outlets looking to clear out old stock. The Series 3 may be more feature rich, but the Series 2 will certainly be more affordable. So which one is right for you?

Compared to the Series 1, both models are waterproofed for swimming, feature built-in GPS tracking and have a dazzling 1000 nits display, which means they’re really bright, even in direct sunlight.

So far so similar. But it’s inside where there’s a difference. The newest Series has an improved processor, which boasts a 70 percent performance increase over the Series 2, as well as a new W2 chipset for improvements to power efficiency and performance improvements for Wi-fi. And if you were sold on the idea of taking calls with your watch and ditching your phone at home, the Series 3 is your best bet as the Series 2 doesn’t come with a built-in SIM.

Do you even need an Apple Watch?

Want and need, two very different things. While you’re sat musing over a Series 1, Series 3 or sporty band or Nike+ edition purchase, consider that you might not actually need an Apple Watch. Especially if you’re not already loaded up with Apple gear.

We know, it’s appealing to get a wearable to match your iPhone or your MacBook, but if you’re after a device built for fitness, the Fitbit Ionic might be more suited to you. It more seamlessly interacts with Android devices, has automatic exercise and a marginally better battery life of 4 days compared to the Apple Watch’s 2. Another obvious alternative is the Samsung Gear S3, as well as the Huawei Watch 2, which both could be discounted for Black Friday too.

Our deal predictions

Outside of being in Tim Cook’s head, there’s no guessing what Apple may be planning to discount for Black Friday. Traditionally, the company has avoided putting on any sales itself, but third party retailers usually deliver the cut price goods.

So what could they be offering? Again, it’s educated guesses, but these items probably stand a good chance of getting a cut.

Simple and stylish, the first gen is still worth a look. Image credit: Apple

Series 1 slashed

The original, if not now the best. Getting on a bit in age, the Apple Watch Series 1 is quite likely to be reduced in price at the shops. It’ll serve up notifications, act as a simple all-day tracker and play nicely with lots of apps. Of course this is the most basic watch from Apple now, but it still gets the job done in many ways.

Could the Series 2 get even bigger price cuts? Considering Apple no longer sells it itself, other retailers may be looking to shift stock to make room for new Series 3 shipments. In the age-to-price-cut ratio stakes, a discounted Series 2 could be more valuable than a Series 1, even if it’s technically more expensive.

Apple gift cards

Just because Apple doesn’t play nicely when it comes to hardware discounts at Black Friday, that doesn’t mean it turns a blind eye totally to the event. If you go into an Apple Store on the big day, there’s a good chance that you’ll get some sort of gift card offer thrown in with a substantial purchase. It’s happened before, and could happen again.

Ace accessories

As fashion items, Apple Watches are great for accessorising, too, whether that’s with a neat charging dock or a few stylish band options. As some of these will be made by third-party manufacturers, they’re perhaps more likely to be discounted for Black Friday than Apple’s own-brand gear. Shop around and you could find some nice little extras to go with your wearable.

http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-faceid-versus-microsoft-windows-hello-2017-10

Microsoft has had Apple’s new face-scanning feature for years, and it works great

Apple FaceID MasksApple introduced FaceID, the facial recognition software debuting with the iPhone X, at a launch event in September 2017. Apple

  • Some people are worried about how well FaceID, a key feature of the iPhone X will work.
  • But facial recognition, the technology underlying FaceID, isn’t new.
  • Windows Hello, Microsoft’s facial recognition system that’s similar to FaceID, has been around for years and works well.

There’s a lot of angst right now over FaceID, Apple’s new facial recognition system that’s a core feature of the upcoming iPhone X.

Besides the obvious privacy concerns, some people are worried that FaceID won’t be fast enough or reliable.

I think those fears are overblown.

Microsoft has offered a similar feature since 2015, and it works great! I can’t guarantee FaceID will work just as well when Apple releases its new $999 phone next month, but Microsoft’s success offers a good sign.

Microsoft’s face recognition feature, which debuted on the Surface Pro 4, is called Windows Hello. Like FaceID, it allows you to log into your device — in this case, a Windows computer — with just your face.

Setting up Windows Hello takes about a minute. The system asks you to stare directly at your camera for a bit while it scans your face. If you’d like, you can repeat the process to improve its ability to recognize you. When setting up a new Windows computer, I usually have it scan my face twice, first with my glasses on and next without.

After that, Window Hello generally just works. Typically, I barely have to glance at the Surface computer I’m using before it unlocks.

Because the camera Windows Hello uses relies on infrared light, it works in the dark. When the feature fails, which isn’t often, you can unlock your computer by typing in a PIN code or a password. It’s reassuring to know your computer is both secure and poised for quick action.

microsoft surface studioThe Microsoft Surface Studio lets you log in with Windows Hello, a facial recognition system. Darren Weaver/Business Insider

Windows Hello wasn’t always as good as it is today. I didn’t keep close track, but when the Surface Pro 4 launched, the feature seemed to fail to recognize my face about one in every ten tries. On the current model of Surface Pro, released earlier this year, Windows Hello’s failure rate is more like one in a hundred.

Security-wise, Windows Hello seems to be on solid footing. Tests by tech experts found the system was able to distinguish between identical twins, meaning it’s not as easy to fool as some previous facial recognition technologies.

And since Windows Hello debuted, there’s been no evidence that the security of the system itself has been compromised. Indeed, the system was designed with security in mind. Importantly, it doesn’t store pictures of your face on your PC; instead, it just keeps a log of the data it expects to see when you look at the camera. Apple says it’s taking a similar approach with FaceID.

microsoft surface book 2The Surface Book 2, launching in November 2017, will be the next Microsoft device with Windows Hello built in. Matt Weinberger/Business Insider

There are some clear differences between Windows Hello and FaceID. Most notably, a laptop sitting on your table is different from a phone you whip out of your pocket. With the latter, it’s not clear if face recognition will be faster or more convenient than using a fingerprint sensor.

Still, if you’re wondering whether FaceID, because it’s such a new technology, will work reliably or even at all, just know that facial recognition is not all that new and it’s already been done well.

Meanwhile, it could be galling to Apple that Microsoft got there first.

Get the latest Microsoft stock price here.