https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/dec/30/studied-neuroscience-understand-addictions-not-cure

I studied neuroscience to understand my addictions. Now I know it’s not the cure

Substance misuse is not a simple problem of brain chemistry. The most powerful influences lie outside our heads

‘Final exams, “last chances” at work, or loved ones’ funerals didn’t stand a chance compared to hitching myself to whatever intoxicating ride I could catch.’
 ‘Final exams, “last chances” at work, or loved ones’ funerals didn’t stand a chance compared to hitching myself to whatever intoxicating ride I could catch.’ Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA

Iused to think addiction was caused by screwy molecules in the brain, and would be cured by neuroscience. I began learning about how the brain works after I ended up in treatment for drug addiction in the mid-1980s, when hopes for neuroscientific cures were as overblown as the hairstyles.

Like many at the time, I envisioned the brain as executive director of an epic drama – solely responsible for the total picture of what I did, felt and thought. My specific purpose in getting a doctorate in behavioural neuroscience was to discover the neural explanation for my irrational choices around mind-altering chemicals. What was the faulty neural switch that swept away heartfelt promises or strongly held convictions in response to practically every opportunity to twist reality? I made increasingly risky and harebrained decisions, as the possibility of transient bliss in a shot of cocaine, a belly full of booze or a head in the (cannabis) clouds came to outweigh my obligations or common sense. Final exams, “last chances” at work, or loved ones’ funerals, for example, didn’t stand a chance compared to hitching myself to whatever intoxicating ride I could catch. By the time I hit bottom, the choice between facing stark reality or using drugs to escape was no choice at all: cortical regulation had completely given way to subcortical impulses and habits.

Globally 35 million people are estimated to suffer from drug use disorders. The causes of this public health disaster are complicated, but it is widely accepted that about half of the contribution comes from inherited risk, and the rest an unfortunate confluence of environmental factors interacting with that biologic vulnerability.

Either way, addiction has been widely seen as an individual dilemma driven by a derelict nervous system. The sanguine view that the problem with people like me is in people like me furnishes tidy categories – sick or well; normal or abnormal – making those personally unaffected by the epidemic seem exempt from responsibility. We’ll find the misguided proteins or pathways correlated with aberrant behaviour, translate this knowledge into biomedical interventions and voila! Cured.

Aristotle thought the brain’s purpose was to cool the blood. Big leaps by Renaissance anatomists including Da Vinci, Broca, Vesalius and Ramón y Cajal helped map brain structures to functions, but progress has been slow due to the mind-boggling diversity among 100bn cells and their complex interactions. As a college student I learned about the brain as if it were like any other body organ and was taught that understanding the function of a few cells would suffice for explaining it in general. There is almost nothing in this simplistic view considered true today.

A clump of abnormal cells may cause a heart attack or melanoma, but substance use disorders involve large swaths of neural real estate and processes such as motivation and learning. Excising brain cells or chemicals responsible for these sorts of global functions isn’t feasible, and the chance of finding a specific gene or chemical responsible for addictive behaviours is nil.

My own journey away from the destructive cycle of addiction started with factors outside my brain rather than direct biological intervention. When I began to see more clearly the terrible costs my drug use was exacting and decided to give sobriety a try, I availed myself of every tool. I benefited from clinical guidance, understanding employers, walks in the woods, shared coffee, tears and laughs with new friends in the same boat; I employed my obsessive-compulsive mind making flashcards for studying biopsychology, and relied on the healing powers of the passage of time. Each of these experiences affected my brain’s structure and function. This is my point. Would (yet) another pharmacological fix, electrical current targeting “addictive circuits”, or (coming soon, no doubt, to a clinic near you!) gene-editing strategy have been more efficient?

Biomedical research is more gung-ho than ever, but I’m not holding my breath. While my loss of naive idealism has been building for a while, my perspective, along with empirical evidence, has broadened quite a bit recently. It is clear that mental health is a function of critical wider connections as much as anything else; restoring or maintaining healthy brain function is a long-term, relational endeavour. Given the brain’s ceaseless and boundless dance with all that is, it’s a good bet that we will find more efficient and effective interventions for substance use disorders through its connections than in individually focused attempts to directly modify brain activity.

In more than 30 years as a neuroscientist, my most profound lesson has been that the brain and behaviour are products of multiple interacting influences, and the most powerful of these are located outside our heads, and therefore beyond the scope of any individual control. The brain acts as a conduit for such influences to shape who we are, but is not the source; therefore addiction is a symptom of dis-ease, rather than a cause.

 Judith Grisel is a behavioural neuroscientist at Bucknell University, Pennsylvania, and author of Never Enough: The Neuroscience and Experience of Addiction

https://electrek.co/2019/12/30/ford-mustang-mach-e-reservations-full-stats/

Ford confirmed that it has sold out its Mustang Mach-E First Edition reservations and the automaker revealed some of the most popular options.

In November, Ford unveiled the Mustang Mach-E, an all-electric crossover and Ford’s first all-electric vehicle built to be electric from the ground up.

The vehicle was mostly well-received and the automaker started taking $500 reservations separately for each option level.

A few weeks after the launch, we noted that Ford removed the option for the ‘First Edition’ on its website.

Today, Ford confirmed that “2021 Mustang Mach-E First Edition reservations are full.”

They released some details about what options reservation holders are going for, including color, battery capacity, and powertrain options.

Carbonized Gray is the most popular choice for the Mustang Mach-E with 38 percent of reservation holders choosing it.

Grabber Blue Metallic is second with 35 percent and Rapid Red third with 27 percent.

Here are the three colors:

Ford also says that “more than 80 percent of U.S. customers are reserving Mach-E with an Extended Range Battery.”

The Mustang Mach-E is offered with range options from 230 miles to 300 miles on a single charge.

A majority of reservation holders, 55 percent, are opting for the all-wheel-drive option.

The Mustang spirit is also going to live in the all-electric car with “almost 30 percent” of US reservations being for the Mach-E GT, which is the highest performance version.

Unsurprisingly, Ford says that “more than a quarter of all reservations are coming from California.”

The first Mustang Mach-E deliveries are expected during the second half of 2020.

Electrek’s Take

While this is encouraging, it’s hard to gauge how strong the demand is without Ford confirming the planned production capacity for 2020.

Ford says that they can produce 50,000 vehicles in the first 12 months.

Since they are talking about 2021 First Edition vehicles and deliveries are not expected until the second half of the year, I have to assume that it’s going to be no more than a few tens of thousands.

That’s not bad, but I believe the real volume is going to come with the more affordable version, like the Select at $43,895 before incentives.

Ford shouldn’t have any issue with demand in the next year or two in the US with the federal tax credit.

https://insideevs.com/features/390343/tesla-cybertruck-engineering-genius-commercial-consumer/

Tesla Cybertruck: Engineering Genius That Will Change The Future

The Cybertruck aims to be a leader for consumer and commercial use.

After the controversial unveiling of Tesla’s Cybertruck, like most, I was perplexed. Is the world ready for such radical change? Is a cyberpunk dystopia where we’re heading as a society? When Cybertruck hits the road, it will definitely drop jaws, but for what reason? After the initial shock subsided, I went ahead and did the obvious thing, and ordered one.

Above: The sci-fi look of Tesla’s Cybertuck (Artwork by Manuel Noboa, EVANNEX)

As with anything new and unfamiliar, public opinion is split on this one. Will this end up another niche (albeit cult-like) vehicle like GM’s Hummer or Mercedes’ G-Wagon? Will it only appeal to the millennial market? Attract only cyberpunk and sci-fi fanboys? Roam only the streets of Silicon Valley? Clearly, it’s not a truck. It’s everything but a truck.

Only it is a truck. Aimed right at the industry-leading Ford F-150, it puts the Ford F-150 to shame. It can tow more, carry more, and can launch much, much faster. At 500 miles of range, it even compares in distance traveled per tank. In fact, military (and many commercial) buyers could be a large part of its customer base. It also appears to beat out the Rivian R1T electric truck.

Above: A head-to-head comparison of the Tesla Cybertruck along with the Rivian R1T and Ford F-150 (Chart: EVBite)

While the Tesla Cybertruck wins on specs, everyone seems to be caught up with its looks. “It doesn’t look like a truck,” is the dominant thing that we’ve been hearing since its debut. Sure, it doesn’t look like a truck… today. But the Cybertruck isn’t today’s truck, it’s the truck of the future.

In terms of literally everything else, it fits the bill (and then some). With its comparable dimensions of 231.7″ long, 79.8″ wide, and 75.0″ high, it seats six adults. The 6.5’ bed plus frunk comes lockable with 100 cubic feet of storage. With clearance angles of 35° approach and 28° departure along with the adaptive air suspension, you can even take this beast off-road.

Above: It turns out you could even charge Tesla’s new ATV in the bed of the Cybertruck (Image: Tesla)

Onboard power outlets for both 110V and 220V as well as a built-in air compressor allows Tesla’s new pickup to outperform the best work trucks available today. Also, let’s not forget the potential for full self-driving which is likely (we hope) to be ready before the release of this electric truck.

Maybe Tesla’s design aesthetic won’t win the hearts of those old truck lovers stuck in their ways. However, without its sci-fi movie looks, it wouldn’t have won the hearts of the next generation of truck enthusiasts. And regardless of Tesla’s design choices, this is clearly engineered to be one of the best trucks on the market tomorrow for both consumer and commercial use cases.

Above: Why Cybertruck represents the truck of the future for both the consumer and commercial markets (YouTube: Solving the Money Problem)

It just works. Tesla isn’t trying to target a niche demographic of cyberpunk enthusiasts. They aren’t selling a gimmicky electric vehicle, they’re selling a truck. Sure, it looks different, but so did the first iPhone. Granted, this might be one of many electric trucks to (eventually) hit the market. But Tesla’s Cybertruck is the only one to stand out and steal the show.

===

An earlier version of this article appeared on EVBite. EVBite is an electric vehicle specific news site dedicated to keeping consumers up-to-date on any developments in the ever-expanding EV landscape.

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article comes to us courtesy of EVANNEX, which makes and sells aftermarket Tesla accessories. The opinions expressed therein are not necessarily our own at InsideEVs, nor have we been paid by EVANNEX to publish these articles. We find the company’s perspective as an aftermarket supplier of Tesla accessories interesting and are happy to share its content free of charge. Enjoy!

https://hackaday.com/2019/12/29/36c3-phyphox-using-smartphone-sensors-for-physics-experiments/

36C3: PHYPHOX – USING SMARTPHONE SENSORS FOR PHYSICS EXPERIMENTS

It’s no secret that the average smart phone today packs an abundance of gadgets fitting in your pocket, which could have easily filled a car trunk a few decades ago. We like to think about video cameras, music playing equipment, and maybe even telephones here, but let’s not ignore the amount of measurement equipment we also carry around in form of tiny sensors nowadays. How to use those sensors for educational purposes to teach physics is presented in [Sebastian Staacks]’ talk at 36C3 about the phyphox mobile lab app.

While accessing a mobile device’s sensor data is usually quite straightforwardly done through some API calls, the phyphox app is not only a shortcut to nicely graph all the available sensor data on the screen, it also exports the data for additional visualization and processing later on. An accompanying experiment editor allows to define custom experiments from data capture to analysis that are stored in an XML-based file format and possible to share through QR codes.

Aside from demonstrating the app itself, if you ever wondered how sensors like the accelerometer, magnetometer, or barometric pressure sensor inside your phone actually work, and which one of them you can use to detect toilet flushing on an airplane and measure elevator velocity, and how to verify your HDD spins correctly, you will enjoy the talk. If you just want a good base for playing around with sensor data yourself, it’s all open source and available on GitHub for both Android and iOS.

https://www.livescience.com/most-important-surprising-quantum-physics-of-2019.html

The 12 Most Important and Stunning Quantum Experiments of 2019

An illustration shows the inside of an atom.

(Image: © Shutterstock)

The smallest scale events have giant consequences. And no field of science demonstrates that better than quantum physics, which explores the strange behaviors of — mostly — very small things. In 2019, quantum experiments went to new and even stranger places and practical quantum computing inched ever closer to reality, despite some controversies. These were the most important and surprising quantum events of 2019.

Google claims “quantum supremacy”

Google's Sycamore chip is kept cool inside their quantum cryostat.

(Image credit: Eric Lucero/Google, Inc.)

If one quantum news item from 2019 makes the history books, it will probably be a big announcement that came from Google: The tech company announced that it had achieved “quantum supremacy.” That’s a fancy way of saying that Google had built a computer that could perform certain tasks faster than any classical computer could. (The category of classical computers includes any machine that relies on regular old 1s and 0s, such as the device you’re using to read this article.)

Google’s quantum supremacy claim, if borne out, would mark an inflection point in the history of computing. Quantum computers rely on strange small-scale physical effects like entanglement, as well as certain basic uncertainties in the nano-universe, to perform their calculations. In theory, that quality gives these machines certain advantages over classical computers. They can easily break classical encryption schemes, send perfectly encrypted messages, run some simulations faster than classical computers can and generally solve hard problems very easily. The difficulty is that no one’s ever made a quantum computer fast enough to take advantage of those theoretical advantages — or at least no one had, until Google’s feat this year.

Not everyone buys the tech company’s supremacy claim though. Subhash Kak, a quantum skeptic and researcher at Oklahoma State University, laid out several of the reasons in this article for Live Science.

 

The kilogram goes quantum

Another 2019 quantum inflection point came from the world of weights and measures. The standard kilogram, the physical object that defined the unit of mass for all measurements, had long been a 130-year-old, platinum-iridium cylinder weighing 2.2 lbs. and sitting in a room in France. That changed this year.

The old kilo was pretty good, barely changing mass over the decades. But the new kilo is perfect: Based on the fundamental relationship between mass and energy, as well as a quirk in the behavior of energy at quantum scales, physicists were able to arrive at a definition of the kilogram that won’t change at all between this year and the end of the universe.

Read more about the perfect kilogram.

Reality broke a little

Quantum bubbles and multiverses.

(Image credit: Shutterstock/Juergen Faelchle)

A team of physicists designed a quantum experiment that showed that facts actually change depending on your perspective on the situation. Physicists performed a sort of “coin toss” using photons in a tiny quantum computer, finding that the results were different at different detectors, depending on their perspectives.

“We show that, in the micro-world of atoms and particles that is governed by the strange rules of quantum mechanics, two different observers are entitled to their own facts,” the experimentalists wrote in an article for Live Science. “In other words, according to our best theory of the building blocks of nature itself, facts can actually be subjective.”

Read more about the lack of objective reality.

Entanglement got its glamour shot

Physicists take first-ever photo of quantum entanglement.

(Image credit: University of Glasgow/CC by 4.0)

For the first time, physicists made a photograph of the phenomenon Albert Einstein described as “spooky action at a distance,” in which two particles remain physically linked despite being separated across distances. This feature of the quantum world had long been experimentally verified, but this was the first time anyone got to see it.

Read more about the unforgettable image of entanglement.

Something big went in multiple directions

An illustration suggests the behavior of big, complex molecules spreading out like ripples across space.

(Image credit: Yaakov Fein, Universität Wien)

In some ways the conceptual opposite of entanglement, quantum superposition is enables a single object to be in two (or more) places at once, a consequence of matter existing as both particles and waves. Typically, this is achieved with tiny particles like electrons.

But in a 2019 experiment, physicists managed to pull off superposition at the largest scale ever: using hulking, 2,000-atom molecules from the world of medical science known as “oligo-tetraphenylporphyrins enriched with fluoroalkylsulfanyl chains.”

Read about the macro-scale achievement of superposition.

Heat crossed the vacuum

A photo shows the experimental device that allowed heat to cross empty space.

A photo shows the experimental device that allowed heat to cross empty space. (Image credit: Violet Carter, UC Berkeley)

Under normal circumstances, heat can cross a vacuum in only one manner: in the form of radiation. (That’s what you’re feeling when the sun’s rays cross space to beat on your face on a summer day.) Otherwise, in standard physical models, heat moves in two manners: First, energized particles can knock into other particles and transfer their energy. (Wrap your hands around a warm cup of tea to feel this effect.) Second, a warm fluid can displace a colder fluid. (That’s what happens when you turn the heater on in your car, flooding the interior with warm air.) So without radiation, heat can’t cross a vacuum.

But quantum physics, as usual, breaks the rules. In a 2019 experiment, physicists took advantage of the fact that at the quantum scale, vacuums aren’t truly empty. Instead, they’re full of tiny, random fluctuations that pop into and out of existence. At a small enough scale, the researchers found, heat can cross a vacuum by jumping from one fluctuation to the next across the apparently empty space.

Read more about heat leaping across the quantum vacuum of space.

Cause and effect might have gone backward

Alien Planets Star Cluster

(Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech)

This next finding is far from an experimentally verified discovery, and it’s even well outside the realm of traditional quantum physics. But researchers working with quantum gravity — a theoretical construct designed to unify the worlds of quantum mechanics and Einstein’s general relativity — showed that under certain circumstances an event might cause an effect that occurred earlier in time.

Certain very heavy objects can influence the flow of time in their immediate vicinity due to general relativity. We know this is true. And quantum superposition dictates that objects can be in multiple places at once. Put a very heavy object (like a big planet) in a state of quantum superposition, the researchers wrote, and you can design oddball scenarios where cause and effect take place in the wrong order.

Read more about cause and effect reversing.

Quantum tunneling cracked

(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Physicists have long known about a strange effect known as “quantum tunneling,” in which particles seem to pass through seemingly impassable barriers. It’s not because they’re so small that they find holes, though. In 2019, an experiment showed how this really happens.

Quantum physics says that particles are also waves, and you can think of those waves as probability projections for the location of the particle. But they’re still waves. Smash a wave against a barrier in the ocean, and it will lose some energy, but a smaller wave will appear on the other side. A similar effect occurs in the quantum world, the researchers found. And as long as there’s a bit of probability wave left on the far side of the barrier, the particle has a chance of making it through the obstruction, tunneling through a space where it seems it should not fit.

Read more about the amazing quantum tunneling effect.

Metallic hydrogen may have appeared on Earth

Jupiter's great red spot

(Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSS/Gerald Eichstadt/Justin Cowart)

This was a big year for ultra-high-pressure physics. And one of the boldest claims came from a French laboratory, which announced that it had created a holy grail substance for materials science: metallic hydrogen. Under high enough pressures, such as those thought to exist at the core of Jupiter, single-proton hydrogen atoms are thought to act as an alkali metal. But no one had ever managed to generate pressures high enough to demonstrate the effect in a lab before. This year, the team said they’d seen it at 425 gigapascals (4.2 million times Earth’s atmospheric pressure at sea level). Not everyone buys that claim, however.

Read more about metallic hydrogen.

We beheld the quantum turtle

Scientists used machine learning to reveal that quantum particles shooting out from the center form a pattern that resembles a turtle. Warmer colors indicate more activity.

(Image credit: Courtesy of Lei Feng/University of Chicago)

Zap a mass of supercooled atoms with a magnetic field, and you’ll see “quantum fireworks”: jets of atoms firing off in apparently random directions. Researchers suspected there might be a pattern in the fireworks, but it wasn’t obvious just from looking. With the aid of a computer, though, researchers discovered a shape to the fireworks effect: a quantum turtle. No one’s yet sure why it takes that shape, however.

Read more about the quantum turtle.

A tiny quantum computer turned back time

A clock

(Image credit: Africa Studio/Shutterstock)

Time’s supposed to move in only one direction: forward. Spill some milk on the ground, and there’s no way to perfectly dry out the dirt and return that same clean milk back into the cup. A spreading quantum wave function doesn’t unspread.

Except in this case, it did. Using a tiny, two-qubit quantum computer, physicists were able to write an algorithm that could return every ripple of a wave to the particle that created it — unwinding the event and effectively turning back the arrow of time.

Read more about reversing time’s arrow.

Another quantum computer saw 16 futures

Tiny particles of light can travel in a superposition of many different states at the same time. Researchers used this quantum quirk to design a prototype computer that can predict 16 different futures at once.

(Image credit: Sergei Slussarenko/Griffith University)

A nice feature of quantum computers, which rely on superpositions rather than 1s and 0s, is their ability to play out multiple calculations at once. That advantage is on full display in a new quantum prediction engine developed in 2019. Simulating a series of connected events, the researchers behind the engine were able to encode 16 possible futures into a single photon in their engine. Now that’s multitasking!

Read more about the 16 possible futures.

https://hexus.net/tech/news/industry/138221-chip-to-chip-quantum-teleportation-demonstrated/

Chip-to-chip quantum teleportation demonstrated

by Mark Tyson on 30 December 2019, 12:11

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaeg7n

Add to My Vaultx

Scientists from the University of Bristol’s Quantum Engineering Technology Labs (QET Labs) and Technical University of Denmark (DTU) have successfully developed some breakthrough chip-scale devices which harness quantum physics. HEXUS has previously reported numerous times on the potential and development of quantum computer processors but another attraction of quantum physics is dubbed ‘quantum entanglement‘ and its potential impact on communications and data transfer is quite astonishing.

Rolling back a little in time, Albert Einstein famously described quantum entanglement as “spooky action at a distance”. In summary, it is an observed that paired quantum particles will have exactly the same properties of position, momentum, spin, and polarisation – even when separated by a large distance. Photons, neutrinos, electrons, and even large molecules can be affected by quantum entanglement. Bringing us nearer to the present day New Atlas points out that quantum entanglement has been demonstrated working over tiny distances – on a single chip – and up to 1,200km, via satellite. This is the first reliable intra-chip demonstration though.

The QET Labs and DTU researchers have specifically claimed that they have successfully tested a silicon photonic chip that can achieve chip-to-chip quantum teleportation. The chips can encode quantum information in light generated inside the circuits and can process the quantum information with high efficiency and extremely low noise. However, most startlingly they demonstrated quantum teleportation of information between two programmable chips for the first time.

“We were able to demonstrate a high-quality entanglement link across two chips in the lab, where photons on either chip share a single quantum state. Each chip was then fully programmed to perform a range of demonstrations which utilise the entanglement,” explained paper co-author Dan Llewellyn of the University of Bristol. “The flagship demonstration was a two-chip teleportation experiment, whereby the individual quantum state of a particle is transmitted across the two chips after a quantum measurement is performed.”

At this time, the research outlined in the Nature published paper entitled Chip-to-chip quantum teleportation and multi-photon entanglement in silicon, says that the entanglement is not 100 per cent reliable. The results show an “extremely high-fidelity quantum teleportation of 91 per cent.”

The scientists say that the hardware was capable of other important functionality such as entanglement swapping (required for quantum repeaters and quantum networks) and four-photon GHZ states (required in quantum computing and the quantum internet).

Paper lead author Dr Jianwei Wang, who has now moved to Peking University, summed up that in the future a single silicon chip could integrate quantum photonic devices and classical electronic controls to “open the door for fully chip-based CMOS-compatible quantum communication and information processing networks”. Thus this research lays the groundwork for large-scale integrated photonic quantum technologies in devices serving these markets.

https://hackaday.com/2019/12/29/the-smart-home-gains-an-extra-dimension/

THE SMART HOME GAINS AN EXTRA DIMENSION

With an ever-growing range of smart-home products available, all with their own hubs, protocols, and APIs, we see a lot of DIY projects (and commercial offerings too) which aim to provide a “single universal interface” to different devices and services. Usually, these projects allow you to control your home using a list of devices, or sometimes a 2D floor plan. [Wassim]’s project aims to take the first steps in providing a 3D interface, by creating an interactive smart-home controller in the browser.

Note: this isn’t just a rendered image of a 3D scene which is static; this is an interactive 3D model which can be orbited and inspected, showing information on lights, heaters, and windows. The project is well documented, and the code can be found on GitHub. The tech works by taking 3D models and animations made in Blender, exporting them using the .glTF format, then visualising them in the browser using three.js. This can then talk to Hue bulbs, power meters, or whatever other devices are required. The technical notes on this project may well be useful for others wanting to use the Blender to three.js/browser workflow, and include a number of interesting demos of isolated small key concepts for the project.

We notice that all the meshes created in Blender are very low-poly; is it possible to easily add subdivision surface modifiers or is it the vertex count deliberately kept low for performance reasons?

This isn’t our first unique home automation interface, we’ve previously written about shAIdes, a pair of AI-enabled glasses that allow you to control your devices just by looking at them. And if you want to roll your own home automation setup, we have plenty of resources. The Hack My House series contains valuable information on using Raspberry Pis in this context, we’ve got information on picking the right sensors, and even enlisting old routers for the cause.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Pi-Zero-based-WiFi-hacking-module-created.448862.0.html

Pi Zero-based WiFi hacking module created

Mr. Smashy's hacking module (Image source: @THESMASHY)
Mr. Smashy’s hacking module (Image source: @THESMASHY)
A security developer on Twitter recently released a tutorial on how to create a WiFi hacking gadget using a Raspberry Pi Zero W. The module runs Raspbian Buster, under the hacker-friendly re4son kernel.

Mr. Smashy, a security developer, announced his latest Raspberry Pi-based creation on Twitter: a WiFi hacking module based on the Pi Zero W. He also released a DIY guide on how to make one for yourself. What do you need to make this hacking gadget?

A Rasperry Pi Zero W, a micro USB cable, a micro SD card, a power bank, and a small case to hold everything together. Mr. Smashy’s WiFi hacking module runs Raspbian Buster, the Pi’s default operating environment, off the SD card, with the hacker-friendly re4son kernel.

Re4son supports WiFi monitoring and injection functionality. While Kali isn’t used here, Raspberry Pi hackers frequently run that security-centric Linux distro under the re4son kernel. Mr. Smashy’s tool provides support for popular WiFi monitoring apps like Aircrack-ng.

What can you do with the device once you have it set up? If you’re a red team penetration tester, you could use it for white hat pen-testing ops. You could also use it to test out your own network’s security. As with any hacking platform, though, we encourage you to be responsible with this tool.

 

https://www.wired.com/story/enhanced-intelligence-vr-sex-our-cyborg-future/

If you could press a button to merge your mind with an artificial intelligence computer—expanding your brain power, your memory, and your creative capacity—would you take the leap?

“I would press it in a microsecond,” says Sebastian Thrun, who previously led Stanford University’s AI Lab.

Turning yourself into a cyborg might sound like pure sci-fi, but recent progress in AI, neural implants, and wearable gadgets make it seem increasingly imaginable.

The weird and wonderful worlds of transhumanism and human enhancement are the subject of the 10th installment of the Sleepwalkers podcast. The final episode in the first season examines a subject that seems to resonate with techno-optimists in Silicon Valley but also raises some big questions: Where do we draw the line between humans and machines? Who should benefit from such technology? How do we retain control of our humanity?

Thrun, a prominent artificial intelligence expert who cofounded Google’s self-driving car project and helped develop the ill-fated wearable computer, Google Glass, argues that human beings are already a product of centuries of technological progress, so it would be foolish to forgo further enhancements. “The human I/O—the input/output, the ears and eyes and smell and so on, voice—are still very inefficient,” he says. “If I could accelerate the reading of all the books into my brain, oh my God, that would be so awesome.”

Keep Reading
illustration of a head
The latest on artificial intelligence, from machine learning to computer vision and more

Yuval Noah Harari, a historian who speculates about humanity’s future, is a leading figure in the burgeoning transhumanist movement. In his recent book, Homo Deus, Harari suggests that our ability to enhance ourselves with computers and bioengineering has already opened up a new era in human history. But he also fears this era—perhaps accelerated by AI—could pose an existential threat to our species. “We are really deciphering the underlying rules of the game of life, and are acquiring the ability to change these rules,” Harari warns.

For now though, using technology to alter our intelligence remains a distant dream, says Andy Schwartz, a neurobiologist at the University of Pittsburgh who works on brain-controlled computer interfaces for patients with physical disabilities. Although the technology is advancing, Schwartz says, it is a mistake to think it will become a pervasive consumer technology within the foreseeable future. “That’s actually not true of a medically invasive procedure that involves putting implants on the surface of the brain,” he cautions.

As technology marches forward, there are many who stand to benefit from human enhancements. Noé Socha, an award-winning jazz guitarist with limited vision, is testing glasses that use video cameras and high-definition screens in front of the retina to restore some eyesight. Socha’s experience highlights the fact that simple enhancements could benefit those with disabilities most, potentially transforming their worlds.

Diversity and inclusivity are also crucial issues for the technology of transhumanism, says Bryony Cole of the Future of Sex podcast and an organizer of sex-tech hackathons. She advocates for sex-related tech—from VR porn to sex toys—to be available to everyone, regardless of their physical ability or gender identity. “The core of our humanity, we want to connect, we want to belong.” she says. “We want to feel like we’re part of something. That’s sort of the core part of that right down to our sexuality.”

According to Harari, the historian, it will be just as important to guard against the capacity for new technology to control us. The power of AI to discover our secrets, our hopes, and our fears has been a recurring theme through season one of Sleepwalkers.

Harari offers some surprisingly simple advice for outsmarting algorithmic manipulation. “Once there is somebody out there, a system out there, an algorithm out there, that knows you better than you know yourself, the game is up,” he says. “You can do something about it, not just by withholding data, but above all by improving your own understanding of yourself. The better you understand yourself, the more difficult it is to manipulate you.”

Wise words to remember as we navigate a new age of technology. And stay tuned to explore more amazing advances—and accompanying risks and conundrums—in the second season of the Sleepwalkers podcast, out in 2020.

https://www.sciencealert.com/the-human-brain-can-locate-the-sensation-of-touch-even-beyond-the-body

The Human Brain Can Locate The Sensation of Touch Even Beyond The Body. Here’s How

DAVID NIELD
30 DEC 2019

Our brains are capable of detecting the location of touch even when it’s not directly on the body, new research shows. An intriguing new study indicates that we can sense how an object we’re holding comes into contact with something else – almost as if it were an extension of ourselves.

If you’re holding a stick that you then use to tap something else, for example, the brain appears to activate a special set of neural sensors to work out what just happened using the vibration patterns as they’re sent through our nervous system.

Of course if something we’re holding is touched, we can feel the shift in pressure as it’s passed on to our fingers – but this latest study shows how we can also figure out the exact location of the contact on the object.

“The tool is being treated like a sensory extension of your body,” neuroscientist Luke Miller, from the University of Lyon in France, told Richard Sima at Scientific American.

Across 400 different tests, Miller and his colleagues got 16 study participants to hold wooden rods, and asked them to try and determine when two taps on those rods were made in locations close to each other.

And the volunteers were surprisingly good at it: they could recognise two touches in close proximity 96 percent of the time.

During the experiments, the researchers were also using electroencephalography (EEG) equipment to record the participants’ brain activity. These scans showed that the brain uses similar neural mechanisms – specifically in the primary somatosensory cortex and the posterior parietal cortex – to detect touches on both our own skin and on objects we’re holding.

We can probably identify the location of a touch on an object before it stops vibrating, the researchers suggest; this could happen in as short a time as 20 milliseconds, based on computer models the team ran as a follow-up to the main experiment.

This isn’t a completely new idea – think of visually impaired people using a cane to sense what’s around them – but no one has previously looked into what’s happening in the brain in so much detail before.

It seems that the brain is able to decode the vibrations as they come through certain nerve endings in our skin, called the Pacinian receptors. By receiving information from these receptors in our hands, the brain parts responsible can then figure out where an object is being hit – and the researchers think we may have even adapted the way we hold tools to get better feedback on what those tools are doing.

One area where this research might be useful is in changing the way prostheses are designed: if we understand how objects between the body and the rest of the world can pass on information to our brain, we might be able to make them work better as sensors.

The work builds on previous research from the same team into how objects can act as extensions to our body, but now we know more about what’s going on inside the brain when this weird phenomenon happens.

“We show that tools are fundamental to human behaviour in a previously underappreciated way: they expand the somatosensory boundaries of our body at the neural level,” write the researchers in their published paper.

“Hence, rather than stopping at the skin, our results suggest that somatosensory processing extends beyond the nervous system to include the tools we use.”

The research has been published in Current Biology.